There has been a new twist in the ongoing legal case between Ripple and US Securities and Change Fee (SEC). The court dismissed the joint settlement petition of both sides due to “procedural errors”. However, Ripple’s Criminal Officer Stuart Alderoty has clarified that the decision does not affect the company’s legal victory.
In this article, we will understand in detail why the court’s decision came, what was the reaction of Ripple and why there has been a stir in investors and community.
Why did the court reject joint petition?
15 Would Possibly, Fresh York’s Pass Judgement on the Southern District Court Court on Analisa Torres Sec vs ripple case The joint petition given by both sides for the settlement was rejected. The court said that the petition was “procedurally incorrect”.
Pass Judgement on Torres said that in the way Ripple and SEC filed the petition for the settlement, they could not complete the necessary legal standards. He said, “Both sides did not follow the necessary legal process to remove the injection and reduce the fine.”
Is Ripple’s victory in danger?
Ripple’s legal head Stuart Alderoty clarified that the decision had no effect on Ripple’s prior victory. He said, “This is only a problem related to the process, there is no question on the status of XRP.”
In March 2025, Ripple announced that his case with SEC is over. However, it is now clear that some formalities are still left.
How low did the fine?
There was an agreement between Ripple and SEC to reduce a fine of $ 125 million. Ripple proposed to give SEC only $ 50 million, which SEC accepted.
However, the court says that in this way it is necessary to mention concrete reasons and rules under the legal process for cuts in the amount, which was not done in this petition.
Why dissatisfaction in community?
Ripple Many investors and members of XRP Family are dissatisfied with the incomplete information given by the team. On X, a user said, “You said the case is over, then what is happening?”
People say that it is not right to avoid the matter by telling only “procedural reasons” and Ripple should show transparency.
US Ripple and American Politics: New controversy
Another controversy over Ripple has arisen, stating that a ripple-subsidized Lobbyist persuaded the President Donald Trump to make the XRP part of the Nationwide Cryptocurrency Hold.
The proposal has been severely criticized by Bitcoin Family, as they want only Bitcoin to become Nationwide Hold.
Conclusion
Ripple and SEC may be trying to settle the case with mutual consent, but it is not easy to ignore the court process. It is clear from this incident that it is very important to follow the rules in the legal system, no matter how much both the sides are. This time for XRP Buyers demands vigilance and transparency. Although Ripple’s legal victory is still maintained, it is necessary to complete every step of the process correctly, otherwise new confusion may arise in a case moving towards a solution.
Also read:Binance hints of pi checklist, hidden in brand Pi image
